A Comparison of Radiographic Film Densitometry Using a New Computerized Tool with a Digital Densitometer

  • Hoorieh Bashizadeh Fakhar Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Elham Sadat Emadian Razavi Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Dental Faculty, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
  • Sepideh Soheilifar Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Dental Faculty, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran
  • Mohammad Javad Kharazifard Statistical Consultant, Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Keywords: Densitometry, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Aluminum, Phantoms, Imaging

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to develop and test a new tool for radiographic densitometry by combining periapical films and aluminum step wedge.

Materials and Methods: We reviewed 50 Kodak E-speed intraoral films. An aluminum step wedge consisting of 16 steps was constructed. Each step was 1mmx3mx10mm. The step wedge was exposed to varying exposure times, ranging from 0.05 second to 0.5 second, increasing in 0.05 second increments. Films were digitalized after processing and the MATLAB software algorithm was ran subsequently. Density of the films was measured again using a digital densitometer. In order to compare the two imaging techniques, three steps were selected. Output data from the MATLAB algorithm were compared with data obtained from the digital densitometer.

Results: The new method could detect significant differences between subsequent exposure times in step 7, while the densitometer did that in steps 7 and 12. The new method’s sensitivity in determining density changes was 5.26%, 84.1% and 93.02% in steps 2, 7, and 12 respectively.

Conclusions: Our new method has an acceptable sensitivity for determining density changes of at least 7 mmEq/Al.


References

- Gulsahi A, Paksoy CS, Ozden S, Kucuk NO, Cebeci AR, Genc Y. Assessment of bone mineral density in the jaws and its relationship to radiomorphometric indices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Jul;39(5):284-9.

- Mauck KF, Cuddihy MT, Atkinson EJ, Melton LJ. Use of clinical prediction rules in detecting osteoporosis in a populationbased sample of postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Mar;165(5):530-6.

- Homolka P, Beer A, Birkfellner W, Nowotny R, Gahleitner A, Tschabitscher M, et al. Bone mineral density measurement with dental quantitative CT prior to dental implant placement in cadaver mandibles: pilot study 1. Radiology. 2002 Jul;224(1): 247-52.

- Lucisano MP, Nelson-Filho P, Morse L, Battaglino R, Watanabe PCA, da Silva RAB, et al. Radiodensitometric and DXA analyses for the measurement of bone mineral density after systemic alendronate therapy. Braz Oral Res.2013May-un;27(3):252-7.

- Popescu D, Ene R, Cirstoiu C. Resurfacing total hip replacement-a therapeutical approach in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and hip arthrosis. J Med Life. 2011 Apr;4(2):178.

- Tonguç MÖ, Büyükkaplan UŞ, Fentoğlu Ö, Gümüş B, Çerçi S, Kırzıoğlu F. Comparison of bone mineral density in the jaws of patients with and without chronic periodontitis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012 Sep;41(6):509-14.

- Horner K, Devlin H. Clinical bone densitometric study of mandibular atrophy using dental panoramic tomography. J Dent. 1992 Feb;20(1):33-7.

- Devlin H, Horner K. Measurement of mandibular bone mineral content using the dental panoramic tomogram. J Dent. 1991 Apr;19(2):116-20.

- Horner K, Devlin H. The relationship between mandibular bone mineral density and panoramic radiographic measurements. J Dent. 1998 May;26(4): 337-43.

- Benson BW, Prihoda TJ, Glass BJ. Variations in adult cortical bone mass as measured by a panoramic mandibular index. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991 Mar;71(3):349-56.

- Božič M, Ihan Hren N. A novel method of dental panoramic tomogram analysis: A perspective tool for a screening test for osteoporosis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;41(8):808-15.

- Benfica e Silva J, Leles C, Alencar A, Nunes C, Mendonça E. Digital subtraction radiography evaluation of the bone repair process of chronic apical periodontitis after root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2010;43(8):673-80.

- Bronnec F, Bouillaguet S, Machtou P. Ex vivo assessment of irrigant penetration and renewal during the cleaning and shaping of root canals: a digital subtraction radiographic study. Int Endod J. 2010 Apr;43(4):275-82.

- Brstavik D, Farrants G, Wahl T, Kerekes K. Image analysis of endodontic radiographs: digital subtraction and quantitative densitometry. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1990 Feb;6(1):6-11.

- Carvalho F, Gonçalves M, Guerreiro-Tanomaru J, Tanomaru-Filho M. Evaluation of periapical changes following endodontic therapy: digital subtraction technique compared with computerized morphometric analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38(7):438-44.

- Carvalho FB, Gonçalves M, Tanomaru-Filho M. Evaluation of chronic periapical lesions by digital subtraction radiography by using Adobe Photoshop CS: a technical report. J Endod. 2007 Apr;33(4):493-7.

- Matsuda Y, Terauchi T, Murahira K, Patil S, Joshi V, Araki K, et al. Exposure time reduction of secondary radiographs used in digital subtraction radiography in detecting intrabony change. Oral Radiol. 2014;30:20-26.

- Mikrogeorgis G, Lyroudia K, Molyvdas I, Nikolaidis N, Pitas I. Digital radiograph registration and subtraction: a useful tool for the evaluation of the progress of chronic apical periodontitis. J Endod. 2004 Jul;30(7):513-7.

- Nummikoski PV, Steffensen B, Hamilton K, Dove SB. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection. J Periodontol. 2000 Apr;71(4):598-605.

- Park JH, Choi YS, Lee GJ, Choi S, Park JH, Kim KS, et al. Novel monitoring method of proximalcaries using digital subtraction radiography. In Computational Biomechanics for Medicine. New York, Springer,2010:139-46.

- Sun HX, Ohki M, Yamada N. Quantitative evaluation of bone repair of periapical lesions using digital subtraction radiography. Oral Radiol. 1991 Jun;7(1):35-46.

- Chakrapani S, Sirisha K, Srilalitha A, Srinivas M. Choice of diagnostic and therapeutic imaging in periodontics and implantology. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2013 Nov;17(6):711-8.

- Brägger U, Pasquali L, Rylander H, Carnes D, Kornman KS. Computer‐assisted densitometric image analysis in periodontal radiography. J Clin Periodontol. 1988 Jan;15(1):27-37.

- Karthikeyan BV, Sujatha V, Prabhuji ML. Furcation Measurements: Realities and Limitations. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2015 Oct;17(4):103-15.

- Khalid I, Kumar DS, Rao S. Use of computer-assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA) in assessing bone density changes in extraction socket. Indian J Stomatol. 2011 Sep;2(3):168-71.

- Kishore DT, Bandiwadekar T, Padma R, Debunath S, Reddy A. Evaluation of relative efficacy of [beta]-tricalcium phosphate with and without type I resorbable collagen membrane in periodontal infrabony defects: A clinical and radiographic study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Mar;14(2):193.

- Özcan E, Sabuncuoğlu FA. Radiological analysis of the relationship between occlusal tooth wear and mandibular alveolar bone density and height. Indian J Dent Res. 2013 Sep-Oct;24(5):555-61.

- Chakrapani S, Sirisha K, Srilalitha A, Srinivas M. Choice of diagnostic and therapeutic imaging in periodontics and implantology. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 2013 Nov;17(6):711.

- Morea C, Dominguez GC, Coutinho A, Chilvarquer I. Quantitative analysis of bone density in direct digital radiographs evaluated by means of computerized analysis of digital images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Sep;39(6):356-61.

- Wadhawan A, Gowda TM, Mehta DS. Gore-tex® versus resolut adapt® GTR membranes with perioglas® in periodontal regeneration. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012 Oct;3(4):406-11.

- Elhayes K, Eldin MA. Calibration of new software with cone beam ct for evaluation of its reliability in densitometric analysis around dental implants. Life Sci J. 2012;9(2):61-7.

- Hamed MS, Elmorsy KA, Moutamed GM, Safaan AM. The Effect Of Low Level Laser Therapy On Osseointegration Of Immediate Implants In Maxi-llary Central Incisors. J Am Sci. 2013;9(4):241-9.

- Khojastehpour L, Mogharrabi S, Dabbaghmanesh MH, Nasrabadi NI. Comparison of the mandibular bone densitometry measurement between normal, osteopenic and osteoporotic postmenopausal women. J Dent (Tehran) 2013 May; 10(3):203.

- Manrique N, Pereira CC, Garcia LM, Micaroni S, Carvalho AA, Perri SH, et al. Alveolar bone healing process in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR): A radiographic densitometry study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Mar-Apr;20(2):222-7.

- Matsuda Y, Hanazawa T, Seki K, Sano T, Ozeki M, Okano T. Accuracy of digora system in detecting artificial peri-implant bone defects. Implant Dent. 2001;10(4):265-71.

- Mohammed NH, Omar HM. Radiodensitometric assessment of alveolar cleft grafting using two different softwares. J Am Sci. 2012;8(11):253-60.

- Bozzini CE, Champin G, Alippi RM, Bozzini C. Bone mineral density and bone strength from the mandible of chronically protein restricted rats. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2011;24(3):223-8.

- Issa JPM, do Nascimento C, Sato S, Santos RE, Benetti ET, de Albuquerque Junior RF. Optical densitometry study of the newly formed bone using rhBMP-2 in Wistar rat mandibles. Int J Morphol. 2007;25(2):347-52.

- Issa JPM, Tiossi R, Watanabe PCA, Siéssere S, Regalo S, Lopes R. Newly formed bone in mandible decortication experimental model using rhBMP-2 evaluated by densitometric study. Int J Morphol. 2008;26(1):83-8.

- Jorge RS, Jorge Jr J, Luz JG. Reconstruction of a mandibular critical-sized defect using iliac graft in rats. Implant Dent. 2006 Sep;15(3):282-9.

- Smolec O, Kos J, Vnuk D, Pirkić B, Stejskal M, Bottegaro NB, et al. Densitometry of calus mineralization in a critical size defect of a rabbit radius. Veterinarski Arhiv. 2010 Jan;80(5):627-36.

- Talaeipour A, Shirazi M, Kheirandish Y, Delrobaie A, Jafari F, Dehpour A. Densitometric evaluation of skull and jaw bones after administration of thyroid hormones in rats. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005;34(6):332-6.

- Haidekker MA, Stevens HY, Frangos JA. Computerized methods for X-ray-based small bone densitometry. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2004 Jan;73(1):35-42.

- Vaccaro C, Busetto R, Bernardini D, Anselmi C, Zotti A. Accuracy and precision of computer-assisted analysis of bone density via conventional and digital radiography in relation to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Am J Vet Res. 2012 Mar;73(3): 381-4.

- Gomes AV, Bazzi JZ, Rozza RE, Berti SD, CoutoSouza PH, Westphalen FH, et al. Radiographic analysis of pixel intensity with aluminum step-wedgeand different spatial resolutions. RGO (Porto Alegre). 2012 Dec;60(4):485-90.

- Nackaerts O, Jacobs R, Pillen M, Engelen L, Gijbels F, Devlin H, et al. Accuracy and precision of a densitometric tool for jaw bone. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006 Jul;35(4):244-8.

- Schropp L, Alyass NS, Wenzel A, Stavropoulos A. Validity of wax and acrylic as soft-tissue simulation materials used in in vitro radiographic studies. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012 Jan;41(8): 686-90.

- de Molon RS, Batitucci RG, Spin-Neto R, Paquier GM, Sakakura CE, Tosoni GM, et al. Comparison of changes in dental and bone radiographic densities in the presence of different soft-tissue simulators using pixel intensity and digital subtraction analyses. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013 Sep;42(9):20130235.

Published
2016-12-31
How to Cite
1.
Bashizadeh Fakhar H, Emadian Razavi ES, Soheilifar S, Kharazifard MJ. A Comparison of Radiographic Film Densitometry Using a New Computerized Tool with a Digital Densitometer. Front Dent. 13(4):252-260.
Section
Original Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)