Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2018. 15(2):69-78.

Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Different Post and Core Materials on Stress Distribution in Radicular Dentin by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
Saied Nokar, Mehran Bahrami, Azam Sadat Mostafavi


Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the stress distribution of different post and core materials in radicular dentin by three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D FEA).

Materials and Methods: Twelve 3D models of a maxillary central incisor were simulated in the ANSYS 5.4 software program. The models were divided into three groups; the first group included: 1-Gold post and core and 2-Nickel-chromium (Ni-Cr) post and core restored with metal-ceramic restorations (MCRs). The second group included: 1-Stainless steel post, 2-Titanium post, 3-Carbon fiber post, 4-Glass fiber post, and 5-Quartz fiber post with composite cores and MCRs. The third group included: 1-Zirconia post and core, 2-Zirconia post, 3-Carbon fiber post, 4-Glass fiber post, and 5-Quartz fiber post; the last four models had composite cores restored with all-ceramic restorations (ACRs). Each specimen was subjected to a compressive load at a 45-degree angle relative to its longitudinal axis at a constant intensity of 100 N. The models were analyzed with regard to the stress distribution in dentin.

Results: Two stress concentration sites were detected in the models. The first group showed the lowest stress levels in the cervical region, while the stress levels detected in the second group were higher than those in the first group and lower than those found in the third group. Fiber-reinforced posts induced a higher stress concentration between the middle and cervical thirds of the root compared to other posts.

Conclusions: According to the results, since cast posts induce lower stresses in dentin, they are recommended for clinical use. Fiber-reinforced posts and ACRs caused the maximum stresses in dentin.


Finite Element Analysis; Post and Core Technique; Dental Stress Analysis

Full Text:



- Ingle JI, Taintor JFJ. Endodontics. 3rd ed. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1985:46-52.

- Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Apr;87(4):431-7.

- Zhang Y, Lu Z, Wang K. [Fracture strength of custom-fabricated celay all-ceramic post and core]. [Article in Chinese]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2002 Feb;20(1):39-41, 44.

- de Castro Albuquerque R, Polleto LT, Fontana RH, Cimini CA. Stress analysis of an upper central incisor restored with different posts. J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Sep;30(9):936-43.

- Lanza A, Aversa R, Rengo S, Apicella D, Apicella A. 3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor. Dent Mater. 2005 Aug;21(8):709-15.

- Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent. 2000 May;13(Spec No):15B-18B.

- Hassan-Ahangari A, Geramy A, Valian A. Ferrule Designs and Stress Distribution in Endodontically Treated Upper Central Incisors: 3D Finite Element Analysis. J Dent (Tehran). 2008 Feb;5(3):105-110.

- Geramy A, Eghbal MJ, Ehsani S. Stress distribution changes after root canal therapy in canine model: a finite element study. Iran Endod J. 2008 Fall;3(4):113-8.

- Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent. 1999 May;27(4):275-8.

- Yaman SD, Karacaer O, Sahin M. Stress distribution of post-core applications in maxillary central incisors. J Biomater Appl. 2004 Jan;18(3):163-77.

- Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Oct;94(4):321-9.

- Ho MH, Lee SY, Chen HH, Lee MC. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effects of posts on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Oct;72(4):367-72.

- Cailleteau JG, Rieger MR, Akin JE. A comparison of intracanal stresses in a post-restored tooth utilizing the finite element method. J Endod. 1992 Nov;18(11):540-4.

- Assif D, Oren E, Marshak BL, Aviv I. Photoelastic analysis of stress transfer by endodontically treated teeth to the supporting structure using different restorative techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1989 May;61(5):535-43.

- Isidor F, Odman P, Brøndum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthodont. 1996 Mar-Apr;9(2):131-6.

- Chen XT, Li XN, Guan ZQ, Liu XG, Gu YX. [Effects of post material on stress distribution in dentine]. [Article in Chinese]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2004 Jul;39(4):302-5.

- Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal and ceramic post-and-core systems. Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Jul-Aug;17(4):476-82.

- Martínez-Insua A, da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Nov;80(5):527-32.

- Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Mar;81(3):262-9.

- Sidoli GE, King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Jul;78(1):5-9.

- Drummond JL. In vitro evaluation of endodontic posts. Am J Dent. 2000 May;13(Spec No):5B-8B.

- Raygot CG, Chai J, Jameson DL. Fracture resistance and primary failure mode of endodontically treated teeth restored with a carbon fiber-reinforced resin post sys-tem in vitro. Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Mar-Apr;14(2):141-5.

- McDonald AV, King PA, Setchell DJ. In vitro study to compare impact fracture resistance of intact root-treated teeth. Int Endod J. 1990 Nov;23(6):304-12.

- King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 1990 Nov;17(6):599-609.

- Duret B, Duret F, Reynaud M. Long-life physical property preservation and post endodontic rehabilitation with the Composipost. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl. 1996 Jan;17(Suppl 20):S50-6.

- Yang HS, Lang LA, Molina A, Felton DA. The effects of dowel design and load direction on dowel-and-core restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jun;85(6):558-67.

- Pierrisnard L, Bohin F, Renault P, Barquins M. Corono-radicular reconstruction of pulpless teeth: A mechanical study using finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Oct;88(4):442-8.

- Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fiber reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials. 2002 Jul;23(13):2667-2682.

- Barjau Escribano A, Sancho Bru JL, Forner Navarro L, Rodríguez Cervantes PJ, Pérez Gónzález A, Sánchez Marín FT. Influence of prefabricated post material on restored teeth: fracture strength and stress distribution. Oper Dent. 2006 Jan-Feb;31(1):47-54.

- Ko CC, Chu CS, Chuag KH, Lee MC. Effects of posts on dentin stress distribution in pulpless teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Sep;68(3):421-7.

- Reinhardt RA, Krejci RF, Pao YC, Stannard JG. Dentin stresses in post-reconstructed teeth with diminishing bone support. J Dent Res. 1983 Sep;62(9): 1002-8.

- Holmes DC, Diaz-Arnold AM, Leary JM. Influence of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Feb;75(2):140-7.

- Digital Engineering. Stress in FEA: Part 3. Available at: July 1, 2016.

- Toksavul S, Zor M, Toman M, Güngör MA, Nergiz I, Artunç C. Analysis of dentin-al stress distribution of maxillary central incisors subjected to various post-and-core applications. Oper Dent. 2006 Jan-Feb;31(1):89-96.

- Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Jun;71(6):565-7.

- Yang HS, Lang LA, Guckes AD, Felton DA. The effect of thermal change on various dowel-and-core restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jul;86(1): 74-80.

- Eskitaşcioğlu G, Belli S, Kalkan M. Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis). J Endod. 2002 Sep;28(9):629-33.

- Heydecke G, Butz F, Hussein A, Strub JR. Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Apr;87(4):438-45.

- Butz F, Lennon AM, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Jan-Feb;14(1):58-64.

- Yaman SD, Alaçam T, Yaman Y. Analysis of stress distribution in a maxillary central incisor subjected to various post and core applications. J Endod. 1998 Feb;24(2):107-11.

- Bolhuis P, de Gee A, Feilzer A. Influence of fatigue loading on four post-and-core systems in maxillary premolars. Quintessence Int. 2004 Sep;35(8):657-67.

- King PA, Setchell DJ, Rees JS. Clinical evaluation of a carbon fiber reinforced car-bon endodontic post. J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Aug;30(8):785-9.

- Dilmener FT, Sipahi C, Dalkiz M. Resistance of three new esthetic post-and-core systems to compressive loading. J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Feb;95(2):130-6.

- Fraga RC, Chaves BT, Mello GS, Siqueira JF Jr. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots after restoration. J Oral Rehabil. 1998 Nov;25(11):809-13.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.