Microtensile Bond Strength between Zirconia Core and Veneering Porcelain after Different Surface Treatments

  • Sakineh Nikzadjamnani Associate Professor, Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Simindokht Zarrati Assistant Professor, Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Masomeh Rostamzadeh Assistant Professor, Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sannadaj, Iran
Keywords: Zirconium Oxide, Surface Properties, Dental Stress Analysis, Dental Veneers

Abstract

Objectives: The long-term clinical success of all-ceramic restorations requires sufficient bond strength between the veneering ceramic and substructure. The present study compared the effects of three methods of surface treatment on the microtensile bond strength of the veneering porcelain to zirconia.

Materials and Methods: Twelve zirconia blocks were randomly divided into four groups of aluminum oxide (Al2O3) air abrasion, carbon dioxide (CO2) laser irradiation, erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser irradiation, and control samples (no surface treatment). After surface treatment, the zirconia blocks were veneered with porcelain. To assess the surface topographies, four surface-treated specimens were left uncoated. Microtensile bond strength was tested in each group and was statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey's test. Surface topographies were examined by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Results: The highest and lowest microtensile bond strength values were recorded in the Al2O3 (43.6±10.0 MPa) and control groups (34.7±8.2 MPa, P<0.05). The bond strengths in the CO2- and Er:YAG-irradiated groups were equal to 40.4±6.5 MPa and 38.2±7.5 MPa, respectively. The majority of the failures (mean=92.44%) were of cohesive nature located in the veneer, followed by mixed fractures (mean=7.6%). The milling marks of the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) machine were apparent in the control samples, while desert-like micro-cracks were observed on the surfaces treated with CO2 and Er:YAG lasers. Al2O3 air abrasion produced the roughest topography.

Conclusions: Al2O3 air abrasion resulted in a higher microtensile bond strength compared to CO2 or Er:YAG laser irradiation. Cohesive failure mode was predominant. No pure adhesive failures were observed.

References

- Matani JD, Kheur M, Jambhekar SS, Bhargava P, Londhe A. Evaluation of experimental coating to improve the zirconia-veneering ceramic bond strength. J Prosthodont. 2014 Dec;23(8):626-33.

- Pak HS, Han JS, Lee JB, Kim SH, Yang JH. Influence of porcelain veneering on the marginal fit of Digident and Lava CAD/CAM zirconia ceramic crowns. J Adv Prosthodont. 2010 Jun; 2(2):33-8.

- Baldissara P, Llukace A, Ciocca L, Valandro FL, Scotti R. Translucency of zirconia copings made with different CAD/CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Jul;104(1):6-12.

- Kohorst P, Junghanns J, Dittmer MP, Borchers L, Stiesch M. Different CAD/CAM-processing routes for zirconia restorations: influence on fitting accuracy. Clin Oral Investig. 2011Aug;15(4):527-36.

- Kim JW, Covel NS, Guess PC, Rekow ED, Zhang Y. Concerns of hydrothermal degradation in CAD/CAM zirconia. J Dent Res. 2010 Jan;89(1):91-5.

- Sharkey S. Metal-ceramic versus all-ceramic restorations: part 2. J Ir Dent Assoc. 2011 Jan; 56(6):273-74.

- Sharkey S. Metal ceramic versus all-ceramic restorations: part 1. J Ir Dent Assoc. 2010 Aug-Sep;56(4):196-99.

- Barao VA, Gennari-Filho H, Goiato MC, dos Santos DM, Pesqueira AA. Factors to achieve aesthetics in all-ceramic restorations. J Craniofac Surg. 2010 Nov;21(6):2007-12.

- Arami S, Hasani-Tabatabae M, Namdar SF, Chiniforush N. Effects of different lasers and particle abrasion on surface characteristics of zirconia ceramic. J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Mar;11(2):233-41.

- Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilze AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part 3: double veneer technique. J Prosthodont. 2008 Jan;17(1):9-13.

- Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Effect of zirconia type on its bond strength with different veneer ceramics. J Prosthodont. 2008 Jul;17(5):401-8.

- Al-Dohan HM, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Shear strength of core-veneer interface in bi-layered ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Apr;91(4):349-55.

- Dundar M, Ozcan M, Comlekoglu E, Gungor MA, Artunc C. Bond strengths of veneering ceramics to reinforced ceramic core materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2005 Jan-Feb;18(1):71-2.

- Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Effect of sandblasting on the long-term performance of dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004 Nov 15;71(2):381-86.

- Shimada Y, Yamaguchi S, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength of dual-cured resin cement to glass ceramics. Dent Mater. 2002 Jul;18(5):380-8.

- Akin H, Ozkurt Z, Kirmali O, Kazazoglu E, Ozdemir AK. Shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic after aluminum oxide sandblasting and various laser treatments. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011 Dec;29(12):797-802.

- Goracci C, Sadek FT, Moticelli F, Cardoso PEC, Ferrari M .Influence of substrate, shape, and thickness on microtensile specimen’s structural integrity and their measured bond strengths. Dent Mater. 2004 Sep;20(7):643-654.

- Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater. 2006 Sep;22(9):857-63.

- Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent. 2007 Nov;35(11):819-26.

- Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Dent Mater. 2007 Jan; 23(1):45-50.

- Fischer J, Grohmann P, Stawarczyk B. Effect of zirconia surface treatments on the shear strength of zirconia/veneering ceramic composites. Dent Mater J. 2008 May;27(3):448-54.

- Usumez A, Hamdemirci N, Koroglu BY, Simsek I, Parlar O, Sari T. Bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic with different surface treatments. Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Jan;28(1):259-66.

- Gokce B, Ozpinar B, Dundar M, Comlekoglu E, Sen BH, Gungor MA. Bond strengths of all-ceramics: acid vs laser etching. Oper Dent. 2007 Mar-Apr;32(2):173-8.

- Cavalcanti AN, Foxton RM, Watson TF, Oliveira MT, Giannini M, Marchi GM. Bond strength of resin cements to a zirconia ceramic with different surface treatments. Oper Dent. 2009 May-Jun;34(3):280-8.

- Foxton RM, Cavalcanti AN, Nakajima M, Pilecki P, Sherriff M, Melo L, et al. Durability of resin cement bond to aluminium oxide and zirconia ceramics after air abrasion and laser treatment. J Prosthodont. 2011 Feb;20(2):84-92.

Published
2017-12-16
How to Cite
1.
Nikzadjamnani S, Zarrati S, Rostamzadeh M. Microtensile Bond Strength between Zirconia Core and Veneering Porcelain after Different Surface Treatments. Front Dent. 14(6):303-312.
Section
Original Article