Effect of Denture Tooth Material on Load Transmission Under Denture Bases

  • Ramin Mosharraf
  • Farzad Ziaei
  • Mahsa Abbasi
Keywords: Denture Bases; Occlusal Forces; Acrylic Resins; Pressure; Artificial Tooth


Objectives: Pressure transmission under denture bases can vary depending on the denture tooth material. The aim of the present study was to evaluate pressure transmission under denture bases using denture teeth of different materials in direct and indirect tooth contacts. Materials and Methods: In this in-vitro study, the pressure transmission generated by five types of denture teeth, including ceramic, nanocomposite, composite-acrylic resin, cross-linked acrylic resin, and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), under direct and indirect pressures was evaluated (n=10). The maximum pressure (MPa) was measured using a strain gauge. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; α=0.05). Results: The denture tooth material had a significant effect on pressure transmission under denture bases (P<0.001). Under direct load, ceramic and PMMA teeth exhibited the maximum and minimum pressures, respectively, contrary to indirect load (P<0.001). Conclusions: Pressure transmission under denture bases significantly varies with the use of different denture tooth materials. Acrylic teeth could be the most favorable choice to reduce the pressure beneath denture bases. Nanocomposite and acrylic resin-composite teeth may be used as alternatives. Key words: Denture Bases; Occlusal Forces; Acrylic Resins; Pressure; Artificial Tooth


1- Atwood DA. Reduction of residual ridges: a major oral disease entity. J Prosthet Dent. 1971 Sep;26(3):266-79.
2- Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent. 1972 Feb;27(2):120-32.
3- Mori S, Sato T, Hara T, Nakashima K, Minagi S. Effect of continuous pressure on histopathological changes in denture-supporting tissues. J Oral Rehabil. 1997 Jan;24(1):37-46.
4- Sato T, Hara T, Mori S, Shirai H, Minagi S. Threshold for bone resorption induced by continuous and intermittent pressure in the rat hard palate. J Dent Res. 1998 Feb;77(2):387-92.
5- Campbell RL. A comparative study of the resorption of the alveolar ridges in denture-wearers and non-denture-wearers. J Am Dent Assoc. 1960 Feb;60:143-53.
6- Ortman HR. Factors of bone resorption of the residual ridge. J Prosthet Dent. 1962 May-Jun;12(3):429-40.
7- Phunthikaphadr T, Takahashi H, Arksornnukit M. Pressure transmission and distribution under impact load using artificial denture teeth made of different materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Nov;102(5):319-27.
8- Suzuki S, Sakoh M, Shiba A. Impact resistance of highly crosslinked plastic denture teeth. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990 Dec;24(12):1661-71.
9- Kawano F, Ohguri T, Ichikawa T, Mizuno I, Hasegawa A. Shock absorbability and hardness of commercially available denture teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2002 May-Jun;15(3):243-7.
10- Mosharraf R, Abed-Haghighi M. A comparison of acrylic and multilithic teeth bond strengths to acrylic denture base material. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009 Sep 1;10(5):E017-24.
11- Kawara M, Carter JM, Ogle RE, Johnson RR. Bonding of plastic teeth to denture base resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Oct;66(4):566-71.
12- Suzuki S. In vitro wear of nano-composite denture teeth. J Prosthodont. 2004 Dec;13(4):238-43.
13- Ghazal M, Albashaireh ZS, Kern M. Wear resistance of nanofilled composite resin and feldspathic ceramic artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Dec;100(6):441-8.
14- Zheng Y, Zheng Y, Ning R. Effects of nanoparticles SiO2 on the performance of nanocomposites. Mater Lett. 2003 Jun;57(19):2940-4.
15- Arksornnukit M, Phunthikaphadr T, Takahashi H. Pressure transmission and distribution under denture bases using denture teeth with different materials and cuspal angulations. J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Feb;105(2):127-36.
16- Ghazal M, Hedderich J, Kern M. Wear of feldspathic ceramic, nano-filled composite resin and acrylic resin artificial teeth when opposed to different antagonists. Eur J Oral Sci. 2008 Dec;116(6):585-92.
17- Stober T, Lutz T, Gilde H, Rammelsberg P. Wear of resin denture teeth by two-body contact. Dent Mater. 2006 Mar;22(3):243-9.
18- Winkler S, Monasky GE, Kwok J. Laboratory wear investigation of resin posterior denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Jun;67(6):812-4.
19- Ghazal M, Yang B, Ludwig K, Kern M. Two-body wear of resin and ceramic denture teeth in comparison to human enamel. Dent Mater. 2008 Apr;24(4):502-7.
20- Al-Ahmad A, Masri R, Driscoll CF, von Fraunhofer J, Romberg E. Pressure generated on a simulated mandibular oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different design. J Prosthodont. 2006 Mar-Apr;15(2):95-101.
21- Masri R, Driscoll CF, Burkhardt J, Von Fraunhofer A, Romberg E. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs. J Prosthodont. 2002 Sep;11(3):155-60.
22- Craig RG, Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Fundamentals of materials science, in Craig's Restorative Dental Materials. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby Elsevier, 2006:40-41.
23- Heath MR. The effect of maximum biting force and bone loss upon masticatory function and dietary selection of the elderly. Int Dent J. 1982 Dec;32(4):345-56.
24- Matsuo T, Matsuo N. Intracellular calcium response to hydraulic pressure in human trabecular cells. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 Jun;80(6):561-6.
25- Berg T Jr, Chase WW, Ray K. Denture base pressure tests. J Prosthet Dent. 1967 Jun;17(6):540-8.
How to Cite
Mosharraf R, Ziaei F, Abbasi M. Effect of Denture Tooth Material on Load Transmission Under Denture Bases. jdt. 15(5):325-31.
Original Article(s)