Microshear Bond Strength of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive to Primary and Permanent Dentin: A Six-Month In Vitro Study

  • Masoud Fallahinejad Ghajari Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Amir Ghassemi Restorative Department, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Mohammadreza Badiee Dentofacial Deformities Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Zahra Abdolazimi Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
  • Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban Proteomics Research Center, Department of Basic Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Keywords: Shear bond strength, Scotchbond, Dentin, Bonding Agents


Objectives: This study aimed to assess the microshear bond strength (MSBS) of Scotchbond Universal adhesive, used in self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes, to primary and permanent dentin at 24 hours and six months.

Materials and Methods: A total of 88 composite micro-cylinders were divided into eight groups (n=11) as follows: (A) Etch-and-rinse, 24 hours, primary dentin; (B) Self-etch, 24 hours, primary dentin; (C) Etch-and-rinse, six months, primary dentin; (D) Self-etch, six months, primary dentin; (E) Etch-and-rinse, 24 hours, permanent dentin; (F) Self-etch, 24 hours, permanent dentin; (G) Etch-and-rinse, six months, permanent dentin; (H) Self-etch, six months, permanent dentin. The MSBS was measured by a testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. Data were analyzed using three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results: The mean MSBS was 12.3±2.3 MPa in A, 18.8±4.1 MPa in B, 11.9±3.7 MPa in C, 16±2.9 MPa in D, 19.1±2.7 MPa in E, 22.8±4.1 MPa in F, 16.2±2.6 MPa in G, and 17.2±4.4 MPa in H. In the self-etch mode, the MSBS was significantly higher than that in the etch-and-rinse mode (P<0.001). The MSBS in permanent teeth was significantly higher than primary teeth (P<0.001). At six months, the MSBS significantly decreased in all groups (P<0.001).

Conclusion: The micro-shear bond strength of Scotchbond Universal adhesive decreases over time and depends on the type of tooth and the mode of application of the adhesive.


Miyazaki M, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa H, Rikuta A, Ando S. Factors affecting the in vitro performance of dentin-bonding system. Japanese Dental Science Review. 2012; 48(1): 53-60.

Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent. 2014; 42(7):800-7.

Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, Diolosà M, Cadenaro M, et al. Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. J Dent. 2014;42(5):603-12.

Mena-Serrano A, Kose C, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD, et al. A New Universal Simplified Adhesive: 6-Month Clinical Evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013; 25(1):55–69.

Perdigão J, Kose C, Mena-Serrano AP, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, et al. A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent. 2014;39(2):113-27.

Lawson N C, Robles A, Fu CC, Lin CP, Sawlania K, Burgessa J O. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent. 2015; 43(10): 1229–34.

Watanabe T, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa H, Rikuta A, Ando S, et al. Effect of prior acid etching on bonding durability of single-step adhesives. Oper Dent. 2008;33(4):426-33.

Montenegro RV, Carlo HL, Dantas Batista AU, Montenegro SHL, Farias OH. Effect of water storage on microshear bond strength of four dental adhesive systems to dentin. JRD. 2015;3(2): 626- 35.

Dantas DC, Ribeiro AI, Lima LH, de Lima MG, Guênes GM, Braz AK, et al. Influence of water storage time on the bond strength of etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesive systems. Braz Dent J. 2008;19(3):219-23.

Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Pashley D, M. Mutluay M. Long-Term Durability of Dental Adhesives. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2015; 2:174–181.

Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e100-21

Beloica M, Goracci C, Carvalho CA, Radovic I, Margvelashvili M, Vulicevic ZR, et al. Microtensile vs microshear bond strength of all-in-one adhesives to unground enamel. J Adhes Dent. 2010;12(6):427-33.

Ishikawa A, Shimada Y, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Micro-tensile and micro-shear bond strengths of current self-etch adhesives to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent. 2007;20(3):161-6.

Andrade AM, Moura SK, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Garcia EJ, Grande RH. Evaluating resin-enamel bonds by microshear and microtensile bond strength tests: effects of composite resin. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18(6):591-8.

Isolan CP, Valente LL, Münchow EA, Basso GR, Pimentel AH, Schwantz JK, et al. Bond strength of a universal bonding agent and other contemporary dental adhesives applied on enamel, dentin, composite, and porcelain. Applied Adhesion Science. 2014; 2(25):2-10

Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Adhesion to Enamel and Dentin: Current Status and Future Challenges. Oper Dent. 2003; 28(3): 215-35.

Sabatini C. Effect of phosphoric acid etching on the shear bond strength of two self-etch adhesives. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21(1):56-62.

Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P,Van Meerbeek B. Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive .into a multi-step adhesive. Dental Materials. 2006; 22(6):533-44.

Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent. 2012; 40(60):475- 84.

Malacarne J, Carvalho RM, de Goes MF, Svizero N, Pashley DH, Tay FR, et al. Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins. Dent Mater. 2006; 22(10):973-980.

Göpferich A. Mechanisms of polymer degradation and erosion. Biomaterials. 1996;17(2):103-14.

Geurtsen W. Substances released from dental resin composites and glass ionomer cements. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106(2p2):687-95.

Ortengren U. On composite resin materials. Degradation, erosion and possible adverse effects in dentists. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1999 (141):1-61.

Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater. 1998;14(1):64-71.

Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ, Shen C. Microtensile strength of composite bonded to hot-pressed ceramics. J Adhes Dent. 1999;2(4):305-13.

Valandro LF, Ozcan M, Amaral R, Leite F, Bottino MA. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to silica-coated and silanized In-Ceram Zirconia before andafter aging. J Prosthodont. 2006;20(1):70-2.

Kern M, Thompson VP. Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73(3):240-9.

Friederich R, Kern M. Resin bond strength to densely sintered alumina ceramic. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;15(4):333-8.

Luque-Martinez IV, Perdigão J, Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effects of solvent evaporation time on immediate adhesive properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater. 2014;30(10):1126-35.

Okuda M, Pereira PN. Nakajima M, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Long-term durability of resin dentin interface: nanoleakage vs. microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent. 2002;27(3):289-96

Takahashi M, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Ikeda M ,Foxton RM, Tagami J. Long-term evaluation of water sorption and ultimate tensile strength of HEMA-containing/-free one step self-etch adhesives. J Dent. 2011; 39(7):506-12.

Giannini M, Makishi P, Ayres AP, Vermelho PM, Fronza BM, Nikaido T, et al. Self-etch adhesive systems: a literature review. Braz Dent J. 2015;26(1):3-10.

How to Cite
Fallahinejad Ghajari M, Ghassemi A, Badiee M, Abdolazimi Z, Akbarzadeh Baghban A. Microshear Bond Strength of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive to Primary and Permanent Dentin: A Six-Month In Vitro Study. Front Dent. 16(3):173-180.
Original Article