Effect of Cyclic Loading on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: An In Vitro Study
Objectives: In clinical conditions, orthodontic brackets are exposed to periodic stresses mainly induced by mastication and intraoral forces. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of cyclic loading to simulate masticatory forces on shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets bonded to teeth using self-etch and total-etch bonding systems.
Materials and Methods: Eighty-four caries- and crack-free bovine mandibular incisors were selected and randomly assigned to two groups based on the type of bonding system. After bonding, all samples were thermocycled (500 cycles) followed by cyclic loading of the half of the specimens in each group by applying 40 N load with 2 Hz frequency for 10,000 cycles. The SBS was measured using a universal testing machine. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) score was calculated subsequently. Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, two-way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney test.
Results: The SBS was 10.09±3.78 MPa and 14.44±6.06 MPa for self-etch and total-etch bonding systems in cyclic loading group, respectively. The SBS was 9.43±5.3 MPa and 11.31±5.42 MPa in self-etch and total-etch groups without cyclic loading, respectively. Cyclic loading did not cause any significant difference in SBS (P>0.05). The ARI scores of the groups were significantly different (P<0.05).
Conclusions: The present results demonstrated that low masticatory forces at 10,000 cycles did not have a significant impact on bracket-adhesive SBS; however, they significantly changed the ARI score. Even though the total-etch bonding system yielded higher SBS than the self-etch system, the performance of both was clinically acceptable.
Verma SK, Maheshwari S, Tariq M, Khan S. The inadequacy of in-vitro orthodontic bond strength testing in clinical application. Int J Dent Sci Res 2013; May-August 1(2):54-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdsr.2013.11.002)
Abdelnaby YL. Effects of cyclic loading on the bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to a porcelain surface using different conditioning protocols. Angle Orthod. 2011 Nov;81(6):1064-9. doi: 10.2319/030211-151.1
Daratsianos N, Jäger A, Eliades T, Bourauel C. In vitro cyclic shear fatigue of the bracket-adhesive complex: a pilot study. J Orofac Orthop. 2012 Apr;73(2):138-50. doi: 10.1007/s00056-011-0069-5.
Ozer F, Blatz MB. Self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems in clinical dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013 Jan;34(1):12-4, 16, 18; quiz 20, 30.
Mansour AY, Drummond JL, Evans CA, Bakhsh Z. In vitro evaluation of self-etch bonding in orthodontics using cyclic fatigue. Angle Orthod. 2011 Sep;81(5):783-7. doi: 10.2319/012811-59.1.
Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003 May-Jun;28(3):215-35.
Korbmacher H1, Klocke A, Huck L, Kahl-Nieke B. Enamel conditioning for orthodontic bonding with a single-step bonding agent. J Orofac Orthop. 2002 Nov;63(6):463-71.
Fowler CS, Swartz ML, Moore BK, Rhodes BF. Influence of selected variables on adhesion testing. Dent Mater. 1992 Jul;8(4):265-9.
Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T. Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res. 1983 Oct;62(10):1076-81.
Turgut M, Attar N, Korkmaz Y, Gokcelik A. Comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded with flowable composites. Dent Mater J. 2011;30(1):66-71.
Katona T. A comparison of the stresses developed in tension, shear peel, and torsion strength testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Sep;112(3):244-51.
D’Attilio M, Traini T, Iorio DD, Varvara G, Festa F, Tecco S. Shear bond strength, bond failure, and scanning electron microscopy analysis of new flowable composite for orthodontic use. Angle Orthod. 2005 May;75(3):410-5.
Mojtahedzadeh F, Akhoundi MS, Noroozi H. Comparison of wire loop and shear blade as the 2 most common methods for testing orthodontic shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Sep;130(3):385-7.
Hammad SM, El Banna MS. Effects of cyclic loading on the shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to resin composite veneer surface using different conditioning protocols. Prog Orthod. 2013 Jun 23;14:14. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-14.
Soderquist SA, Drummond JL, Evans CA. Bond strength evaluation of ceramic and stainless steel bracket bases subjected to cyclic tensile loading. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Feb;129(2):175.e7-175.e12.
Sung JW, Kwon TY, Kyung HM. Debonding forces of three different customized bases of a lingual bracket system. Korean J Orthod. 2013 Oct;43(5):235-41. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2013.43.5.235.
Moseley HC, Horrocks EN, Pearson GJ, Davies EH. Effects of cyclic stressing on attachment bond strength using glass ionomer cement and composite resin. Br J Orthod. 1995 Feb;22(1):23-7.
Zardiackas LD, Caldwell DJ, Caughman WF, Lentz DL, Comer RW. Tensile fatigue of resin cements to etched metal and enamel. Dent Mater. 1988 Jun;4(3):163-8.
Dorminey JC, Dunn WJ, Taloumis LJ. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a modified 1-step etchant-and-primer technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Oct;124(4):410-3.
Sreedhara S, Savakkanavar MB, Rajesh RN, Ankireddy RK, Sanjay N, Girish KS. Effect of Self-etch Primer-adhesive and Conventional Adhesive Systems on the Shear Bond Strength and Bond Failure of Orthodontic Brackets: A Comparative Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Feb 1;16(2):130-4.
Arnold RW, Combe EC, Warford JH Jr. Bonding of stainless steel brackets to enamel with a new self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Sep;122(3):274-6.
Reynolds IR. A Review of Direct Orthodontic Bonding. Br J Orthod.1975 Jul;2(3):171-8. doi: 10.1080/0301228X.1975.11743666.
Türköz C, Ulusoy C. Evaluation of different enamel conditioning techniques for orthodontic bonding. Korean J Orthod. 2012 Feb;42(1):32-8. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2012.42.1.32.