Finite Element Analysis of Stress in Bone and Abutment-Implant Interface under Static and Cyclic Loadings

Analysis of Bone around Implant

  • Saeed Nokar ORCID Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Hamid Jalali Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran AND Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Farideh Nozari Private Practice, Tehran, Iran
  • Mahnaz Arshad ORCID Mail Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran AND Department of Prosthodontics, International Campus, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Finite Element Analysis, Fractures, Stress, Dental Implants, Bone


Objectives: The success of implant treatment depends on many factors affecting the bone-implant, implant-abutment, and abutment-prosthesis interfaces. Stress distribution in bone plays a major role in success/failure of dental implants. This study aimed to assess the pattern of stress distribution in bone and abutment-implant interface under static and cyclic loadings using finite element analysis (FEA).
Materials and Methods: In this study, ITI implants (4.1×12 mm) placed at the second premolar site with Synocta abutments and metal-ceramic crowns were simulated using SolidWorks 2007 and ABAQUS software. The bone-implant contact was assumed to be 100%. The abutments were tightened with 35 Ncm preload torque according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Static and cyclic loads were applied in axial (116 Ncm), lingual (18 Ncm), and mesiodistal (24 Ncm) directions. The maximum von Mises stress and strain values ​​were recorded.
Results: The maximum stress concentration was at the abutment neck during both static and cyclic loadings. Also, maximum stress concentration was observed in the cortical bone. The loading stress was higher in cyclic than static loading.
Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the level of stress in single-unit implant restorations is within the tolerable range by bone.


1. Zhang X, Liu L, Wang Y, Chen X. Effects of dental implant-abutment interfaces on the reliability of implant systems. MATEC Web Conf., 2016 Oct;77:08006.
2. Lee JI, Lee Y, Kim NY, Kim YL, Cho HW. A photoelastic stress analysis of screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses with marginal gaps. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Oct;15(5):735-49.
3. Mehdi G, Belarbi A, Mansouri B, Azari Z. Numerical study of effect of elastomeric stress absorbers on stress reduction in bone-dental implant interface. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015 Jan-Feb;23(1):87-93.
4. Zhang X, Xie ZG, Feng W, Chen XS, Chen JY. Effects of custom-made and thread dental implant system on the stress distribution in alveolar bone: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Appl Mech Mater. 2014;475:1487-93.
5. El-Anwar MI, Yousief SA, Soliman TA, Saleh MM, Omar WS. A finite element study on stress distribution of two different attachment designs under implant supported overdenture. Saudi Dent J. 2015 Oct;27(4):201-7.
6. Mishra M, Ozawa S, Masuda T, Yoshioka F, Tanaka Y. Finite element study on the effect of abutment length and material on implant bone interface against dynamic loading. J Adv Prosthodont. 2011 Sep;3(3):140-4.
7. Prados-Privado M, Bea JA, Rojo R, Gehrke SA, Calvo-Guirado JL, Prados-Frutos JC. A new model to study fatigue in dental implants based on probabilistic finite elements and cumulative damage model. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2017;2017:3726361.
8. Gehrke SA. Importance of crown height ratios in dental implants on the fracture strength of different connection designs: An in vitro study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Aug;17(4):790-7.
9. Segundo RM, Oshima HM, da Silva IN, Burnett LH Jr, Mota EG, Silva LL. Stress distribution of an internal connection implant prostheses set: a 3D finite element analysis. Stomatologija. 2009;11(2):55-9.
10. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. In: Patient selection and preparation. Tissue integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, editor. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Company; 1985. p. 199–209.
11. Kayabasi O, Yuzbasioglu E, Erzincanli F. Static, dynamic and fatigue behaviors of dental implant using finite element method. Adv Eng Softw. 2006 Oct;37(10):649-58.
12. Quek HC, Tan KB, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue performance of four implant-abutment interface designs: effect of torque level and implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Mar-Apr;23(2):253-62.
13. Dhatrak P, Shirsat UM, Deshmukh V. Fatigue life prediction of commercial dental implants based on biomechanical parameters: A review. IJSEIMS. 2015 May;3(2):221-6.
14. Chang CL, Chen CS, Yeung TC, Hsu ML. Biomechanical effect of a zirconia dental implant-crown system: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jul-Aug;27(4):49-57.
15. Hou PJ, Ou KL, Wang CC, Huang CF, Ruslin M, Sugiatno E, et al. Hybrid micro/nanostructural surface offering improved stress distribution and enhanced osseointegration properties of the biomedical titanium implant. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Mar;79:173-180.
16. Pierrisnard L, Renouard F, Renault P, Barquins M. Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003 Dec;5(4):254-62.
17. Tian K, Chen J, Han L, Yang J, Huang W, Wu D. Angled abutments result in increased or decreased stress on surrounding bone of single-unit dental implants: a finite element analysis. Med Eng Phys. 2012 Dec;34(10):1526-31.
18. Saab XE, Griggs JA, Powers JM, Engelmeier RL. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: a finite element study. J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Feb;97(2):85-92.
19. Brozović J, Demoli N, Farkaš N, Sušić M, Alar Z, Gabrić Pandurić D. Properties of axially loaded implant-abutment assemblies using digital holographic interferometry analysis. Dent Mater. 2014 Mar;30(3):17-27.
20. Minatel L, Verri FR, Kudo GAH, de Faria Almeida DA, de Souza Batista VE, Lemos CAA, et al. Effect of different types of prosthetic platforms on stress-distribution in dental implant-supported prostheses. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017 Feb;71:35-42.
21. Pérez MA. Life prediction of different commercial dental implants as influence by uncertainties in their fatigue material properties and loading conditions. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2012 Dec;108(3):1277-86.
22. Shemtov-Yona K, Rittel D. Identification of failure mechanisms in retrieved fractured dental implants. Eng Failure Anal. 2014 Mar;38:58-65.
23. Belli S, Eskitaşcioǧlu G, Eraslan O, Senawongse P, Tagami J. Effect of hybrid layer on stress distribution in a premolar tooth restored with composite or ceramic inlay: an FEM study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005 Aug;74(2):665-8.
25. Huang HM, Tsai CM, Chang CC, Lin CT, Lee SY. Evaluation of loading conditions on fatigue-failed implants by fracture surface analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Nov-Dec;20(6):854-9.
26. Frost HM. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians. The Angle Orthod. 2004 Feb;74(1):3-15.
How to Cite
Nokar S, Jalali H, Nozari F, Arshad M. Finite Element Analysis of Stress in Bone and Abutment-Implant Interface under Static and Cyclic Loadings. Front Dent. 17.
Original Article